Former U.S. President Donald Trump has stated that Palestinians in Gaza would not have a right to return under his proposed plan for U.S. “ownership” of the territory. His comments contradict previous claims from officials in his administration that suggested any relocation of the population would be temporary. Trump’s remarks come amid ongoing discussions about the future of Gaza and pressure on Arab nations to accommodate displaced Palestinians.
A Bold Proposal for Gaza’s Future
Trump first introduced his controversial vision for Gaza last week, suggesting that the U.S. could take control of the war-ravaged territory and transform it into “the Riviera of the Middle East.” The idea was met with widespread skepticism and concern, particularly from Palestinian leaders and human rights groups.
During an interview with FOX News’ Bret Baier, Trump clarified his stance on the right of return for Palestinians, saying, “No, they wouldn’t,” when asked if displaced Palestinians would be allowed back into Gaza. This statement stands in stark contrast to previous assertions from members of his administration that suggested any relocation would be temporary.
Relocation Over Return
Trump emphasized the need to build new communities for displaced Palestinians outside of Gaza. “We’ll build safe communities, a little bit away from where they are, where all of this danger is,” he said. This approach aligns with his broader strategy of pressuring Arab states, particularly U.S. allies Jordan and Egypt, to accept Palestinian refugees.
The former president framed his vision in economic terms, describing it as a real estate opportunity rather than a humanitarian crisis. “In the meantime, I would own this. Think of it as a real estate development for the future. It would be a beautiful piece of land. No big money spent,” he added.
Reactions and Concerns
Trump’s comments have sparked debate over the feasibility and ethics of his plan. Critics argue that preventing Palestinians from returning to Gaza would violate international law and human rights. Additionally, Arab states have expressed reluctance to accept Palestinian refugees, fearing long-term implications for their own political stability.
As discussions about the future of Gaza continue, Trump’s proposal adds another layer of complexity to an already contentious issue. His emphasis on U.S. control and economic development raises significant questions about the rights of displaced Palestinians and the role of the international community in resolving the crisis.
Trump’s assertion that Palestinians in Gaza would not have a right to return under his plan has reignited controversy over the region’s future. His proposal, which frames Gaza as a potential real estate investment, faces strong opposition from Palestinians and international observers. With tensions high and Arab states resisting external pressure, the future of Gaza remains uncertain.